The Literature review of pain and welfare impacts associated with on-farm cattle husbandry procedures aimed to provide the cattle industry with information needed to negotiate the development of new cattle welfare standards for husbandry practices including castration, spaying, dehorning, branding and ear marking.
Summary
The project reviewed the welfare science on five beef cattle husbandry practices: castration, spaying, dehorning, branding and ear marking. It also examined Australian and international standards for the conduct of these practices, including those of a selection of animal welfare groups. There is a considerable body of science on castration and dehorning in particular. Regimes for effective anaesthesia and/or analgesia have been developed for various methods of castration and dehorning and certain methods are preferable to others from a welfare perspective. There is less information available on the other practices. A review of pain management in other species reinforced the potential effectiveness of local anaesthesia and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Current Australian welfare standards for cattle and sheep are generally in line with those of New Zealand and less restrictive than those of European countries.
This review attempts only to present the science of cattle welfare with some consideration of a range of standards. Industry must make judgements about appropriate levels of animal welfare that also take into account practicality, cost, public perception, market acceptability and other factors. A series of recommendations is made to assist the industry deal with the possible medium- and long-term evolution of animal welfare expectations and legislation.
When: 10 September 2007 to 16 December 2008
Contact: Scott Williams and Stephen Page
Collaborator: SED Consulting and Advanced Veterinary Therapeutics
More information
For more information please read the final report summary and download the final report (B.AWW.0189) (PDF, 1.1 MB) from the Meat & Livestock Australia website.
